CaseIH Puma 160 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1997 for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6901 kg for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1997–2000 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.1 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 901 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 27 / 24 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 10 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 302 cm |
| Length | — | 470 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs Fendt Favorit 716 VarioDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs Landini Legend 165Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX155Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs White 6144