CaseIH Puma 160 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1997 for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6901 kg for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1997–2000 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.1 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 901 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 27 / 24 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 10 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 302 cm |
| Length | — | 470 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1997 for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6901 kg for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160?
The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs Fendt Favorit 716 VarioDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs Landini Legend 165Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX155Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs White 6144