CaseIH Puma 160 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3

Side-by-side specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 160

CaseIH Puma 160

160 HP · 2011–2013

View full specs
Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3

Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3

160 HP · 2001–2003

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
  • The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2001 for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3.
  • The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5940 kg for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3.
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6221 kg versus 3583 kg.

Full specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 160Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3
Power160 HP160 HP
Production years2011–20132001–2003
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders66
Displacement6.7 L7.1 L
Weight7 420 kg5 940 kg
Drive4WD4WD
TransmissionPower shift
Gears (fwd/rev)18 / 6
Rear lift capacity3 583 kg6 221 kg
Wheelbase273 cm276 cm
Length475 cm
CabYes

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3?

The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 deliver the same power: 160 HP.

Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3?

The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2001 for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3.

Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3?

The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5940 kg for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3?

The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6221 kg versus 3583 kg.

Other comparisons