CaseIH Puma 160 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2001 for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5940 kg for the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6221 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2001–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.1 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 5 940 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 6 221 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 276 cm |
| Length | — | 475 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 vs Fendt Favorit 716 VarioDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 vs John Deere 6920S PremiumDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 vs Landini Legend 165Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 vs McCormick Intl MTX155