CaseIH Puma 160 vs SAME Rubin 160
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the SAME Rubin 160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2000 for the SAME Rubin 160.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6801 kg for the SAME Rubin 160.
- The SAME Rubin 160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | SAME Rubin 160 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2000–2004 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 801 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 10 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 284 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the SAME Rubin 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the SAME Rubin 160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the SAME Rubin 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2000 for the SAME Rubin 160.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the SAME Rubin 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6801 kg for the SAME Rubin 160.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the SAME Rubin 160?
The SAME Rubin 160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eHurlimann H-1600 SX vs SAME Rubin 160Kirovets K-3160 ATM vs SAME Rubin 160Lamborghini Champion 160 vs SAME Rubin 160McCormick Intl MTX165 vs SAME Rubin 160