CaseIH Puma 160 vs SAME Rubin 160
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the SAME Rubin 160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2000 for the SAME Rubin 160.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6801 kg for the SAME Rubin 160.
- The SAME Rubin 160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | SAME Rubin 160 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2000–2004 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 801 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 10 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 284 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eHurlimann H-1600 SX vs SAME Rubin 160Kirovets K-3160 ATM vs SAME Rubin 160Lamborghini Champion 160 vs SAME Rubin 160McCormick Intl MTX165 vs SAME Rubin 160

