CaseIH Puma 160 vs Steyr 6160 CVT
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Steyr 6160 CVT deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2007 for the Steyr 6160 CVT.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6490 kg for the Steyr 6160 CVT.
- The Steyr 6160 CVT offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9902 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Steyr 6160 CVT | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2007–2012 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.6 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 490 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | CVT |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 9 902 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 280 cm |
| Length | — | 477 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Steyr 6160 CVT?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Steyr 6160 CVT deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Steyr 6160 CVT?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2007 for the Steyr 6160 CVT.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Steyr 6160 CVT?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6490 kg for the Steyr 6160 CVT.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Steyr 6160 CVT?
The Steyr 6160 CVT offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9902 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 150.7 vs Steyr 6160 CVTKirovets K-3160 ATM vs Steyr 6160 CVTMcCormick Intl XTX165 vs Steyr 6160 CVTMcCormick Intl XTX185 vs Steyr 6160 CVT