CaseIH Puma 160 vs XTZ XTZ-21041
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the XTZ XTZ-21041 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The XTZ XTZ-21041 is heavier: 8799 kg versus 7420 kg for the CaseIH Puma 160.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | XTZ XTZ-21041 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | — |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.1 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 8 799 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 289 cm |
| Length | — | 515 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the XTZ XTZ-21041?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the XTZ XTZ-21041 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the XTZ XTZ-21041?
The XTZ XTZ-21041 is heavier: 8799 kg versus 7420 kg for the CaseIH Puma 160.