CaseIH Puma 165 vs Hurlimann H-6170
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 165 and the Hurlimann H-6170 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 165 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 1984 for the Hurlimann H-6170.
- The Hurlimann H-6170 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 165 | Hurlimann H-6170 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 165 HP | 165 HP |
| Production years | 2014+ | 1984–1991 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | — | 6 500 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 27 / 9 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 7 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 286 cm |
| Length | — | 473 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 165 vs Fendt 614 VarioCaseIH Puma 165 vs John Deere 6165JCaseIH Puma 165 vs Landini Landpower 180CaseIH Puma 165 vs Massey Ferguson 7618Hurlimann H-6170 vs Renault 175-74 TZHurlimann H-6170 vs Schluter Super 1500 TVL SpecialHurlimann H-6170 vs Schluter Super-Trac 1600 TVLHurlimann H-6170 vs Schluter Super-Trac 1700 TVL