CaseIH Puma 165 vs Hurlimann H-6170
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 165 and the Hurlimann H-6170 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 165 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 1984 for the Hurlimann H-6170.
- The Hurlimann H-6170 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 165 | Hurlimann H-6170 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 165 HP | 165 HP |
| Production years | 2014+ | 1984–1991 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | — | 6 500 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 27 / 9 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 7 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 286 cm |
| Length | — | 473 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the Hurlimann H-6170?
The CaseIH Puma 165 and the Hurlimann H-6170 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the Hurlimann H-6170?
The CaseIH Puma 165 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 1984 for the Hurlimann H-6170.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the Hurlimann H-6170?
The Hurlimann H-6170 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 165 vs Fendt 614 VarioCaseIH Puma 165 vs John Deere 6165JCaseIH Puma 165 vs Landini Landpower 180CaseIH Puma 165 vs Massey Ferguson 7618Hurlimann H-6170 vs Renault 175-74 TZHurlimann H-6170 vs Schluter Super 1500 TVL SpecialHurlimann H-6170 vs Schluter Super-Trac 1600 TVLHurlimann H-6170 vs Schluter Super-Trac 1700 TVL