CaseIH Puma 170 vs International Harvester 1486B
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 170 and the International Harvester 1486B deliver the same power: 167 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1981 for the International Harvester 1486B.
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6065 kg for the International Harvester 1486B.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 170 | International Harvester 1486B | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 167 HP | 167 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1981–1982 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.1 L |
| Weight | 8 500 kg | 6 065 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | — |
| Length | — | 426 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the International Harvester 1486B?
The CaseIH Puma 170 and the International Harvester 1486B deliver the same power: 167 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the International Harvester 1486B?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1981 for the International Harvester 1486B.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the International Harvester 1486B?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6065 kg for the International Harvester 1486B.
Other comparisons
Allis Chalmers 7045 vs International Harvester 1486BAllis Chalmers 8050 vs International Harvester 1486BCaseIH Puma 170 vs Deutz-Fahr TTV 620CaseIH Puma 170 vs John Deere 7430 PremiumCaseIH Puma 170 vs McCormick Intl X7.670CaseIH Puma 170 vs New Holland T7.220International Harvester 1486B vs John Deere 4640International Harvester 1486B vs White 2-155