CaseIH Puma 195 vs Ford FW-35
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 195 and the Ford FW-35 deliver the same power: 195 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1986 for the Ford FW-35.
- The Ford FW-35 is heavier: 9300 kg versus 7999 kg for the CaseIH Puma 195.
- The Ford FW-35 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6860 kg versus 5800 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 195 | Ford FW-35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 195 HP | 195 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 1986–1988 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.6 L |
| Weight | 7 999 kg | 9 300 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 17 / 6 | 16 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 6 860 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 342 cm |
| Length | — | 660 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the Ford FW-35?
The CaseIH Puma 195 and the Ford FW-35 deliver the same power: 195 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the Ford FW-35?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1986 for the Ford FW-35.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the Ford FW-35?
The Ford FW-35 is heavier: 9300 kg versus 7999 kg for the CaseIH Puma 195.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the Ford FW-35?
The Ford FW-35 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6860 kg versus 5800 kg.