Challenger MT315B vs McCormick Intl C60 Max
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT315B and the McCormick Intl C60 Max deliver the same power: 58 HP.
- The Challenger MT315B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl C60 Max.
- The McCormick Intl C60 Max offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2600 kg versus 2494 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 58 HP | 58 HP |
| Production years | 2006–2007 | 2004–2007 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 |
| Displacement | 3.3 L | 3.3 L |
| Weight | — | 2 980 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 24 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 2 494 kg | 2 600 kg |
| Wheelbase | 210 cm | 222 cm |
| Length | 375 cm | 401 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT315B or the McCormick Intl C60 Max?
The Challenger MT315B and the McCormick Intl C60 Max deliver the same power: 58 HP.
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT315B or the McCormick Intl C60 Max?
The Challenger MT315B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl C60 Max.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT315B or the McCormick Intl C60 Max?
The McCormick Intl C60 Max offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2600 kg versus 2494 kg.