Challenger MT765C vs John Deere 9230
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 9230 is more powerful than the Challenger MT765C: 325 HP versus 320 HP (+5 HP, +2%).
- The Challenger MT765C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2007 for the John Deere 9230.
- The Challenger MT765C offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7257 kg versus 6940 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT765C | John Deere 9230 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 HP | 325 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2011 | 2007–2011 |
| Fuel | Electric | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 8.8 L | 9 L |
| Drive | — | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Partial power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 4 | 24 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 7 257 kg | 6 940 kg |
| Wheelbase | — | 350 cm |
| Length | — | 685 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT765C or the John Deere 9230?
The John Deere 9230 is more powerful than the Challenger MT765C: 325 HP versus 320 HP (+5 HP, +2%).
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT765C or the John Deere 9230?
The Challenger MT765C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2007 for the John Deere 9230.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT765C or the John Deere 9230?
The Challenger MT765C offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7257 kg versus 6940 kg.