Cockshutt 40 vs Minneapolis-Moline UTU
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Cockshutt 40 and the Minneapolis-Moline UTU deliver the same power: 47 HP.
- The Cockshutt 40 is the more recent model: production started in 1949, versus 1938 for the Minneapolis-Moline UTU.
- The Minneapolis-Moline UTU is heavier: 2494 kg versus 2406 kg for the Cockshutt 40.
Full specs comparison
| Cockshutt 40 | Minneapolis-Moline UTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 47 HP | 47 HP |
| Production years | 1949–1958 | 1938–1955 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3.8 L | 4.6 L |
| Weight | 2 406 kg | 2 494 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 6 / 2 | 5 / 1 |
| Wheelbase | 220 cm | 223 cm |
| Length | — | 354 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cockshutt 40 or the Minneapolis-Moline UTU?
The Cockshutt 40 and the Minneapolis-Moline UTU deliver the same power: 47 HP.
Which is more recent, the Cockshutt 40 or the Minneapolis-Moline UTU?
The Cockshutt 40 is the more recent model: production started in 1949, versus 1938 for the Minneapolis-Moline UTU.
Which is heavier, the Cockshutt 40 or the Minneapolis-Moline UTU?
The Minneapolis-Moline UTU is heavier: 2494 kg versus 2406 kg for the Cockshutt 40.