Massey Ferguson 140 vs McCormick Intl CT50U
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 140 and the McCormick Intl CT50U deliver the same power: 43 HP.
- The McCormick Intl CT50U is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 1966 for the Massey Ferguson 140.
- The McCormick Intl CT50U is heavier: 2270 kg versus 1450 kg for the Massey Ferguson 140.
- The McCormick Intl CT50U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1496 kg versus 1031 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 140 | McCormick Intl CT50U | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 43 HP | 43 HP |
| Production years | 1966–1975 | 2008–2010 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 |
| Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Weight | 1 450 kg | 2 270 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 6 / 2 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 031 kg | 1 496 kg |
| Wheelbase | 182 cm | 187 cm |
| Length | 299 cm | 317 cm |
| Cab | — | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 140 or the McCormick Intl CT50U?
The Massey Ferguson 140 and the McCormick Intl CT50U deliver the same power: 43 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 140 or the McCormick Intl CT50U?
The McCormick Intl CT50U is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 1966 for the Massey Ferguson 140.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 140 or the McCormick Intl CT50U?
The McCormick Intl CT50U is heavier: 2270 kg versus 1450 kg for the Massey Ferguson 140.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 140 or the McCormick Intl CT50U?
The McCormick Intl CT50U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1496 kg versus 1031 kg.
Other comparisons
Bukh 403 vs Massey Ferguson 140David Brown 3800 vs Massey Ferguson 140Hurlimann Prince 45 vs McCormick Intl CT50ULandini Mistral 45 vs McCormick Intl CT50UMassey Ferguson 140 vs Oliver 1250-AMassey Ferguson 140 vs Schluter Super 400Massey Ferguson 1643 vs McCormick Intl CT50UMcCormick Intl CT50U vs Montana 4320