Cub Cadet 95 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1974 for the Cub Cadet 95.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 215 kg for the Cub Cadet 95.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 32".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet 95 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | — | 64 HP |
| Production years | 1974–1975 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Weight | 215 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | — | Hydrostatic |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 3 / 1 | — |
| Wheelbase | 88 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | — | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 32" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet 95 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1974 for the Cub Cadet 95.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet 95 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 215 kg for the Cub Cadet 95.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet 95 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 32".