Cub Cadet LT1040 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LT1040: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
- The Cub Cadet LT1040 is the more recent model: production started in 2005, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 212 kg for the Cub Cadet LT1040.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet LT1040 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 18 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2005–2008 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 |
| Weight | 212 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | CVT | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 116 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 172 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet LT1040 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LT1040: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet LT1040 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet LT1040 is the more recent model: production started in 2005, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet LT1040 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 212 kg for the Cub Cadet LT1040.