Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Scotts S1642
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is more powerful than the Scotts S1642: 37 HP versus 16 HP (+21 HP, +131%).
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 1999 for the Scotts S1642.
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is heavier: 698 kg versus 175 kg for the Scotts S1642.
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 has the wider mower deck: 72" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet Tank S7237 | Scotts S1642 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 37 HP | 16 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2012 | 1999–2001 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Electric |
| Cylinders | 2 | 1 |
| Weight | 698 kg | 175 kg |
| Drive | — | 2WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 137 cm | — |
| Length | 228 cm | 152 cm |
| Mower deck | 72" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Scotts S1642?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is more powerful than the Scotts S1642: 37 HP versus 16 HP (+21 HP, +131%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Scotts S1642?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 1999 for the Scotts S1642.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Scotts S1642?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is heavier: 698 kg versus 175 kg for the Scotts S1642.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Scotts S1642?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 has the wider mower deck: 72" versus 42".
Other comparisons
Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs John Deere 1565 Series IICub Cadet Tank S7237 vs John Deere Z970ACub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Montana lawn tractors MTZ 3572Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Montana lawn tractors MZT 3560Scotts S1642 vs Toro Z16-44Scotts S1642 vs Wheel Horse 16-38XLScotts S1642 vs White LT 1650Scotts S1642 vs White Z-16