John Deere 1600 Turbo vs Scotts L2548
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts L2548: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 241 kg for the Scotts L2548.
- The Scotts L2548 has the wider mower deck: 48" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 1600 Turbo | Scotts L2548 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 64 HP | 25 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2006 | 2002 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Electric |
| Cylinders | 4 | 2 |
| Weight | 1 791 kg | 241 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 152 cm | — |
| Length | 335 cm | 152 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 48" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts L2548?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts L2548: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts L2548?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 241 kg for the Scotts L2548.
Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts L2548?
The Scotts L2548 has the wider mower deck: 48" versus 42".