CaseIH Puma 160 vs Ford 8630
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Ford 8630 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1992 for the Ford 8630.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 4354 kg for the Ford 8630.
- The Ford 8630 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6645 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Ford 8630 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1992–1997 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 8.1 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 4 354 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Partial power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 12 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 6 645 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 288 cm |
| Length | — | 441 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Ford 8630?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Ford 8630 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Ford 8630?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1992 for the Ford 8630.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Ford 8630?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 4354 kg for the Ford 8630.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Ford 8630?
The Ford 8630 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6645 kg versus 3583 kg.