CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX155
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the McCormick Intl MTX155 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2000 for the McCormick Intl MTX155.
- The McCormick Intl MTX155 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6935 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX155 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2000–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | — |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 6 935 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 284 cm |
| Length | — | 522 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl MTX155?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the McCormick Intl MTX155 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl MTX155?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2000 for the McCormick Intl MTX155.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl MTX155?
The McCormick Intl MTX155 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6935 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX155Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 vs McCormick Intl MTX155Fendt Favorit 716 Vario vs McCormick Intl MTX155Hurlimann H-1600 SX vs McCormick Intl MTX155