CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX155

Side-by-side specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 160

CaseIH Puma 160

160 HP · 2011–2013

View full specs
McCormick Intl MTX155

McCormick Intl MTX155

160 HP · 2000–2003

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The CaseIH Puma 160 and the McCormick Intl MTX155 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
  • The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2000 for the McCormick Intl MTX155.
  • The McCormick Intl MTX155 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6935 kg versus 3583 kg.

Full specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 160McCormick Intl MTX155
Power160 HP160 HP
Production years2011–20132000–2003
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders66
Displacement6.7 L6 L
Weight7 420 kg—
Drive4WD4WD
TransmissionPower shiftPower shift
Gears (fwd/rev)18 / 616 / 12
Rear lift capacity3 583 kg6 935 kg
Wheelbase273 cm284 cm
Length—522 cm
CabYesYes

Other comparisons

CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX155Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 vs McCormick Intl MTX155Fendt Favorit 716 Vario vs McCormick Intl MTX155Hurlimann H-1600 SX vs McCormick Intl MTX155