Cub Cadet FMZ 50 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet FMZ 50: 64 HP versus 22 HP (+42 HP, +191%).
- The Cub Cadet FMZ 50 is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 309 kg for the Cub Cadet FMZ 50.
- The Cub Cadet FMZ 50 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet FMZ 50 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 22 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2008 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 309 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | — | 152 cm |
| Length | 228 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 50" | 42" |
Other comparisons
Craftsman 917.20393 vs Cub Cadet FMZ 50 SDCraftsman 917.20413 vs Cub Cadet FMZ 50 SDCraftsman 917.28638 vs Cub Cadet FMZ 50Craftsman 917.28638 vs Cub Cadet FMZ 50 SDCraftsman 917.28853 vs Cub Cadet FMZ 50 SDCub Cadet FMZ 50 vs John Deere Z510ACub Cadet FMZ 50 vs John Deere Z810ACub Cadet FMZ 50 vs Simplicity Javelin 22/50