CaseIH Puma 160 vs Hurlimann H-6160

Side-by-side specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 160

CaseIH Puma 160

160 HP · 2011–2013

View full specs
Hurlimann H-6160

Hurlimann H-6160

160 HP · 1979–1984

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Hurlimann H-6160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
  • The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1979 for the Hurlimann H-6160.
  • The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6500 kg for the Hurlimann H-6160.
  • The Hurlimann H-6160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6001 kg versus 3583 kg.

Full specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 160Hurlimann H-6160
Power160 HP160 HP
Production years2011–20131979–1984
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders66
Displacement6.7 L6.8 L
Weight7 420 kg6 500 kg
Drive4WD2WD or 4WD
TransmissionPower shift—
Gears (fwd/rev)18 / 612 / 4
Rear lift capacity3 583 kg6 001 kg
Wheelbase273 cm286 cm
Length—473 cm
CabYes—

Other comparisons

CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Allis DX7.10 vs Hurlimann H-6160Hurlimann H-6160 vs International Harvester 1486Hurlimann H-6160 vs John Deere 4930Hurlimann H-6160 vs SAME Hercules 160