CaseIH Puma 160 vs Hurlimann H-6160
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Hurlimann H-6160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1979 for the Hurlimann H-6160.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6500 kg for the Hurlimann H-6160.
- The Hurlimann H-6160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Hurlimann H-6160 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1979–1984 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 500 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 12 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 6 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 286 cm |
| Length | — | 473 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Hurlimann H-6160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Hurlimann H-6160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Hurlimann H-6160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1979 for the Hurlimann H-6160.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Hurlimann H-6160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6500 kg for the Hurlimann H-6160.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Hurlimann H-6160?
The Hurlimann H-6160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Allis DX7.10 vs Hurlimann H-6160Hurlimann H-6160 vs International Harvester 1486Hurlimann H-6160 vs John Deere 4930Hurlimann H-6160 vs SAME Hercules 160