CaseIH Puma 160 vs Hurlimann H-1600 SX
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Hurlimann H-1600 SX deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2000 for the Hurlimann H-1600 SX.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6801 kg for the Hurlimann H-1600 SX.
- The Hurlimann H-1600 SX offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Hurlimann H-1600 SX | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2000–2004 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 801 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 10 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 284 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Hurlimann H-1600 SX?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Hurlimann H-1600 SX deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Hurlimann H-1600 SX?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2000 for the Hurlimann H-1600 SX.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Hurlimann H-1600 SX?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6801 kg for the Hurlimann H-1600 SX.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Hurlimann H-1600 SX?
The Hurlimann H-1600 SX offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eHurlimann H-1600 SX vs John Deere 6920S PremiumHurlimann H-1600 SX vs McCormick Intl MTX155Hurlimann H-1600 SX vs McCormick Intl MTX165Hurlimann H-1600 SX vs SAME Rubin 160