CaseIH Puma 160 vs Kirovets K-3160 ATM
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Kirovets K-3160 ATM deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the Kirovets K-3160 ATM.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6758 kg for the Kirovets K-3160 ATM.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Kirovets K-3160 ATM | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2004–2008 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.1 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 758 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 287 cm |
| Length | — | 503 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Kirovets K-3160 ATM?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Kirovets K-3160 ATM deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Kirovets K-3160 ATM?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the Kirovets K-3160 ATM.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Kirovets K-3160 ATM?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6758 kg for the Kirovets K-3160 ATM.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eKirovets K-3160 ATM vs Lamborghini Champion 160Kirovets K-3160 ATM vs McCormick Intl MTX165Kirovets K-3160 ATM vs SAME Rubin 160Kirovets K-3160 ATM vs Steyr 6160 CVT