CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX165
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the McCormick Intl MTX165 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl MTX165.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 7341 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX165.
- The McCormick Intl MTX165 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8328 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2004–2005 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 7 341 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 8 328 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 286 cm |
| Length | — | 523 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl MTX165?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the McCormick Intl MTX165 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl MTX165?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl MTX165.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl MTX165?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 7341 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX165.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl MTX165?
The McCormick Intl MTX165 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8328 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eHurlimann H-1600 SX vs McCormick Intl MTX165Kirovets K-3160 ATM vs McCormick Intl MTX165Lamborghini Champion 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX165McCormick Intl MTX165 vs SAME Rubin 160