CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX165

Side-by-side specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 160

CaseIH Puma 160

160 HP · 2011–2013

View full specs
McCormick Intl MTX165

McCormick Intl MTX165

160 HP · 2004–2005

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The CaseIH Puma 160 and the McCormick Intl MTX165 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
  • The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl MTX165.
  • The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 7341 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX165.
  • The McCormick Intl MTX165 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8328 kg versus 3583 kg.

Full specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 160McCormick Intl MTX165
Power160 HP160 HP
Production years2011–20132004–2005
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders66
Displacement6.7 L6.8 L
Weight7 420 kg7 341 kg
Drive4WD4WD
TransmissionPower shiftPower shift
Gears (fwd/rev)18 / 616 / 12
Rear lift capacity3 583 kg8 328 kg
Wheelbase273 cm286 cm
Length—523 cm
CabYesYes

Other comparisons

CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eHurlimann H-1600 SX vs McCormick Intl MTX165Kirovets K-3160 ATM vs McCormick Intl MTX165Lamborghini Champion 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX165McCormick Intl MTX165 vs SAME Rubin 160