CaseIH Puma 195 vs Hurlimann H-2000 SX
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 195 and the Hurlimann H-2000 SX deliver the same power: 195 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2000 for the Hurlimann H-2000 SX.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is heavier: 7999 kg versus 7101 kg for the Hurlimann H-2000 SX.
- The Hurlimann H-2000 SX offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 5800 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 195 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 195 HP | 195 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 2000–2004 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 7 999 kg | 7 101 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 17 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 10 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 284 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Other comparisons
Buhler Versatile 2145 vs CaseIH Puma 195CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX200CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX215CaseIH Puma 195 vs New Holland T7050Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 205 MK3 vs Hurlimann H-2000 SXHurlimann H-2000 SX vs Lamborghini Champion 200Hurlimann H-2000 SX vs McCormick Intl MTX185Hurlimann H-2000 SX vs SAME Rubin 200