CaseIH Puma 195 vs Hurlimann H-2000 SX
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 195 and the Hurlimann H-2000 SX deliver the same power: 195 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2000 for the Hurlimann H-2000 SX.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is heavier: 7999 kg versus 7101 kg for the Hurlimann H-2000 SX.
- The Hurlimann H-2000 SX offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 5800 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 195 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 195 HP | 195 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 2000–2004 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 7 999 kg | 7 101 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 17 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 10 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 284 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the Hurlimann H-2000 SX?
The CaseIH Puma 195 and the Hurlimann H-2000 SX deliver the same power: 195 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the Hurlimann H-2000 SX?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2000 for the Hurlimann H-2000 SX.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the Hurlimann H-2000 SX?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is heavier: 7999 kg versus 7101 kg for the Hurlimann H-2000 SX.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the Hurlimann H-2000 SX?
The Hurlimann H-2000 SX offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10001 kg versus 5800 kg.
Other comparisons
Buhler Versatile 2145 vs CaseIH Puma 195CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX200CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX215CaseIH Puma 195 vs New Holland T7050Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 205 MK3 vs Hurlimann H-2000 SXHurlimann H-2000 SX vs Lamborghini Champion 200Hurlimann H-2000 SX vs McCormick Intl MTX185Hurlimann H-2000 SX vs SAME Rubin 200